linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] PM / Sleep: Change wakeup statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMP5Xgd0Ve=rtwxCAtPrMS9ycbkt+Fo9VDW4sjp2s5oBTm0ZQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:11:58 -0800
From:	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@...uxfoundation.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] PM / Sleep: Change wakeup statistics

2012/2/15 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>> >
>> > Wakeup statistics used by Android are slightly different from what we
>> > have at the moment, so modify them to follow Android more closely.
>> ...
>> > @@ -438,6 +444,11 @@ static void wakeup_source_deactivate(str
>> >        if (ktime_to_ns(duration) > ktime_to_ns(ws->max_time))
>> >                ws->max_time = duration;
>> >
>> > +       ws->last_time = now;
>> > +       if (ws->has_timeout && time_after(jiffies, ws->timer_expires))
>>
>> time_after_eq may work better (or increment the count from the timer).
>
> I think incrementing the count from the timer is a better approach.
>

OK.

>> I applied this patch and the expire counts I see for wakeup-sources
>> that always time-out do not match the active count.
>
> I see.  The reason may also be that __pm_wakeup_event() increments
> ws->event_count even if the wakeup source is already active.
>

The active count, which is what I was looking at, only changes if it
was not already active though.

-- 
Arve Hjønnevåg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/