| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:53:39 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: core: remove obsolete comment Target-like applications or peer-to-peer-like applications require the global address handler registration which we have right now, or a per- card registration. And node lookup, while it would be nice to have, would be impossible in the brief time between self-ID-complete event and completion of firewire-core's topology scanning. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> --- drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c +++ b/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c @@ -840,14 +840,6 @@ static void handle_exclusive_region_requ offset, request->length); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&address_handler_lock, flags); - /* - * FIXME: lookup the fw_node corresponding to the sender of - * this request and pass that to the address handler instead - * of the node ID. We may also want to move the address - * allocations to fw_node so we only do this callback if the - * upper layers registered it for this node. - */ - if (handler == NULL) fw_send_response(card, request, RCODE_ADDRESS_ERROR); else -- Stefan Richter -=====-===-- --=- =--=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists