[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120218195339.13d36f44@stein>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:53:39 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: core: remove obsolete comment
Target-like applications or peer-to-peer-like applications require the
global address handler registration which we have right now, or a per-
card registration. And node lookup, while it would be nice to have,
would be impossible in the brief time between self-ID-complete event and
completion of firewire-core's topology scanning.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
---
drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
@@ -840,14 +840,6 @@ static void handle_exclusive_region_requ
offset, request->length);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&address_handler_lock, flags);
- /*
- * FIXME: lookup the fw_node corresponding to the sender of
- * this request and pass that to the address handler instead
- * of the node ID. We may also want to move the address
- * allocations to fw_node so we only do this callback if the
- * upper layers registered it for this node.
- */
-
if (handler == NULL)
fw_send_response(card, request, RCODE_ADDRESS_ERROR);
else
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-===-- --=- =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists