[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F415F55.6050902@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:45:09 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Test saved %rip in NMI to determine
nested NMI
On 02/19/2012 12:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 05:46 -0800, hpanvin@...il.com wrote:
>> Vsyscall page, not vdso...
>
> Peter,
>
> My original patch was to check the %cs register against __KERNEL_CS, but
> IIRC, you said that userspace can change that register to anything it
> wanted before doing a long jump or something. Is this true for x86_64 as
> well? I guess it would be because x86_64 can support 32bit apps.
>
> Anyway, I'll add a check that makes sure that the RIP is less than the
> FIXADDR sections as well.
>
User space can change %cs, but it can never set it to __KERNEL_CS;
specifically user space can never set the bottom two bits in CS to zero.
So this should be a better test.
(Now, doing the test that way plays havoc with the braindamage knows as
Xen paravirt, but I don't think it's subject to this particular NMI code.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists