[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120220073301.GA22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:33:01 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] ARM: at91: make ST (System Timer) soc independent
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:02:34AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 12:52 Mon 20 Feb , Ryan Mallon wrote:
> > That isn't an excuse to leave incorrect code there. It is a simple fix.
> no (void) in c means you don't care of the return so basically it's right
Let's be clear: it's legal, but redundant and unnecessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists