[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120220073941.GC22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:39:41 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/gpio.txt: Explain expected pinctrl
interaction
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:27:42PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Update gpio.txt based on recent discussions regarding interaction with the
> pinctrl subsystem.
>
> Previously, gpio_request() was described as explicitly not performing any
> required mux setup operations etc.
>
> Now, gpio_request() is explicitly as explicitly performing any required mux
> setup operations where possible. In the case it isn't, platform code is
> required to have set up any required muxing or other configuration prior to
> gpio_request() being called, in order to maintain the same semantics.
So what if you need to have the pin as a GPIO, manipulate it as a GPIO,
and then hand it off to a special function, and then take it back as
a GPIO before you shut the special function down ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists