linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/18] ARM: at91: make ST (System Timer) soc independent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:18:09 +0100
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] ARM: at91: make ST (System Timer) soc independent

On 07:33 Mon 20 Feb     , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:02:34AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 12:52 Mon 20 Feb     , Ryan Mallon wrote:
> > > That isn't an excuse to leave incorrect code there. It is a simple fix.
> > no (void) in c means you don't care of the return so basically it's right
> 
> Let's be clear: it's legal, but redundant and unnecessary.
So as I said it's no the focus of this patch

I don't want to do it at the same time

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/