[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87aa4dq1tq.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:11:21 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] sched: entity load-tracking re-work
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:48:06 -0800, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This is almost certainly a result of me twiddling with the weight in
> calc_cfs_shares (using average instead of instantaneous weight) in
> this version -- see patch 11/14. While this had some nice stability
> properties it was not hot for fairness so I've since reverted it
> (snippet attached below).
>
For my understanding, what do you mean by stability here?
>
> 24-core:
> Starting task group fair16...done
> Starting task group fair32...done
> Starting task group fair48...done
> Waiting for the task to run for 120 secs
> Interpreting the results. Please wait....
> Time consumed by fair16 cgroup: 12628615 Tasks: 96
> Time consumed by fair32 cgroup: 12562859 Tasks: 192
> Time consumed by fair48 cgroup: 12600364 Tasks: 288
>
"Tasks:" should be 16,32,48?
Regards,
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists