| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1202200329420.4225@eggly.anvils>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:38:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] thp: optimize away unnecessary page table locking
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:21:02PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > > Currently when we check if we can handle thp as it is or we need to
> > > split it into regular sized pages, we hold page table lock prior to
> > > check whether a given pmd is mapping thp or not. Because of this,
> > > when it's not "huge pmd" we suffer from unnecessary lock/unlock overhead.
> > > To remove it, this patch introduces a optimized check function and
> > > replace several similar logics with it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> > > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > Changes since v4:
> > > - Rethink returned value of __pmd_trans_huge_lock()
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > --- 3.3-rc2.orig/mm/mremap.c
> > > +++ 3.3-rc2/mm/mremap.c
> > > @@ -155,8 +155,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > if (err > 0) {
> > > need_flush = true;
> > > continue;
> > > - } else if (!err) {
> > > - split_huge_page_pmd(vma->vm_mm, old_pmd);
> > > }
> > > VM_BUG_ON(pmd_trans_huge(*old_pmd));
> > > }
>
> Thanks for reporting,
>
> > Is that what you intended to do there?
>
> No. This is a bug.
>
> > I just hit that VM_BUG_ON on rc3-next-20120217.
>
> I found that when extend != HPAGE_PMD_SIZE, thp is not split so
> it hits the VM_BUG_ON.
> The following patch cancels the change in returned value in v4->v5
> and I confirmed this fixes the problem in my simple test.
> Andrew, could you add it on top of this optimization patch?
>
> Naoya
> ----------------------------------------------------
> From 3c49816cab7d8cb072d9dffb97242e40f5124230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:48:12 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] fix mremap bug of failing to split thp
>
> The patch "thp: optimize away unnecessary page table locking" introduced
> a bug to move_page_tables(), where we fail to split thp when move_huge_pmd()
> is not called. To fix it, this patch reverts the return value changes and
> readd if (!err) block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
That fixes the case I hit, thank you. Though I did have to apply
the task_mmu.c part by hand, there are differences on neighbouring
lines.
Jiri, your "Regression: Bad page map in process xyz" is actually
on linux-next, isn't it? I wonder if this patch will fix yours too
(you were using zypper, I was updating with yast2).
Hugh
> ---
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 6 +++---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 13 ++++++-------
> mm/mremap.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 7810281..2d12325 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int smaps_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> pte_t *pte;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> - if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma)) {
> + if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma) == 1) {
> smaps_pte_entry(pmd_to_pte_t(pmd), addr, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE, walk);
> spin_unlock(&walk->mm->page_table_lock);
> mss->anonymous_thp += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int pagemap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> /* find the first VMA at or above 'addr' */
> vma = find_vma(walk->mm, addr);
>
> - if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma)) {
> + if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma) == 1) {
> for (; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> unsigned long offset = (addr & ~PAGEMAP_WALK_MASK)
> >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static int gather_pte_stats(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>
> md = walk->private;
>
> - if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, md->vma)) {
> + if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, md->vma) == 1) {
> pte_t huge_pte = pmd_to_pte_t(pmd);
> struct page *page;
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bbf57b5..f342bb2 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int zap_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma)) {
> + if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma) == 1) {
> struct page *page;
> pgtable_t pgtable;
> pgtable = get_pmd_huge_pte(tlb->mm);
> @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ int mincore_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma)) {
> + if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma) == 1) {
> /*
> * All logical pages in the range are present
> * if backed by a huge page.
> @@ -1094,12 +1094,11 @@ int move_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(old_pmd, vma)) {
> + if ((ret = __pmd_trans_huge_lock(old_pmd, vma)) == 1) {
> pmd = pmdp_get_and_clear(mm, old_addr, old_pmd);
> VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*new_pmd));
> set_pmd_at(mm, new_addr, new_pmd, pmd);
> spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> - ret = 1;
> }
> out:
> return ret;
> @@ -1111,7 +1110,7 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma)) {
> + if (__pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma) == 1) {
> pmd_t entry;
> entry = pmdp_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pmd);
> entry = pmd_modify(entry, newprot);
> @@ -1125,7 +1124,7 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>
> /*
> * Returns 1 if a given pmd maps a stable (not under splitting) thp.
> - * Returns 0 otherwise.
> + * Returns -1 if it maps a thp under splitting. Returns 0 otherwise.
> *
> * Note that if it returns 1, this routine returns without unlocking page
> * table locks. So callers must unlock them.
> @@ -1137,7 +1136,7 @@ int __pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd_t *pmd, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> if (unlikely(pmd_trans_splitting(*pmd))) {
> spin_unlock(&vma->vm_mm->page_table_lock);
> wait_split_huge_page(vma->anon_vma, pmd);
> - return 0;
> + return -1;
> } else {
> /* Thp mapped by 'pmd' is stable, so we can
> * handle it as it is. */
> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
> index 22458b9..87bb839 100644
> --- a/mm/mremap.c
> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (err > 0) {
> need_flush = true;
> continue;
> + } else if (!err) {
> + split_huge_page_pmd(vma->vm_mm, old_pmd);
> }
> VM_BUG_ON(pmd_trans_huge(*old_pmd));
> }
> --
> 1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists