[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877gzhpvpv.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:23:16 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:51:13 +0100, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 13:38 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_FLUSH_TLB
> > + while (!cpumask_empty(to_cpumask(f->flush_cpumask)) && --loop)
> > + cpu_relax();
> > + if (!loop && !cpumask_empty(to_cpumask(f->flush_cpumask)))
> > + halt();
>
>
> That's just vile, you don't need to wait for it, all you need to make
> sure is that when that vcpu wakes up it does the flush.
>
Yes, but we are not sure the vcpu will be sleeping or running. In the
case where vcpus are running, it might be beneficial to wait a while.
For example: If its a remote flush to only one of the vcpu and its
already running, is it worthed to halt and come back?
Regards,
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists