[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120220151419.GU9751@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:14:19 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in
crash path
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:21:52PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:41:01AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>
> >> The fix with a guarantee of no more scope creep is to just disable the
> >> nmi watchdog on the kexec on panic path.
> >>
> >> Don if you have time please figure out is needed to ignore nmi's and
> >> possible record and/or report them while we boot, otherwise please cook
> >> up a patch that just disables the nmi watchdog wherever we are sending
> >> it from (the local apic or the ioapic).
> >
> > Can I keep things even simpler? The original problem was the deadlock
> > with the ioapic lock. We fixed that by removing the call to
> > disable_IO_APIC(). Can we just leave the disable_local_APIC calls in
> > there for now? Is there any real harm?
>
> > All this rewrite is going to take time which will delay fixing a current
> > problem with kexec on panic, the ioapic deadlock.
>
> Hmm.
>
> My apologies I just realized that we can not disable the nmi watchdog
> safely in all cases. To avoid the deadlock we fundamentally can not
> write to the io_apic, because the locks are the io_apic write path.
> The nmi watchdog can be sourced from either the local apics or the
> io_apics. To disable the nmi_watchdog we need at least potentially
> to write io_apic.
I am curious where you see the nmi watchdog being sourced from the ioapic?
I thought I removed that code 3 or 4 releases ago.
>
> So it appears to me that the only reasonable and robust thing we can
> do is to ignore nmis in the kexec on panic path.
>
> So it looks to me that the only path forward at this point is to fix
> the other bug where an unexpected nmi will kill the kexec on panic boot.
>
> I just took a look at the code in /sbin/kexec and that code does not in
> fact change the idt except when we switch to 16bit mode, which we
> definitely do not do in the kexec on panic case. So it appears that we
> don't need to coordinate an /sbin/kexec release with a kernel release to
> ignore nmis.
>
> In fact it looks like we only need to fix the interrupt descriptors
> loaded in machine_kexec_64.c and head64.c to ignore nmis.
>
> At which point we will have fixed two bugs and have a much more reliable
> kexec on panic implementation.
Ok. I'll talk with Vivek about how the can be implemented.
Cheers.
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists