[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329754301.2293.358.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:11:41 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/14] sched: implement usage tracking
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 02:54 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 17:38 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> >> static inline void update_rq_runnable_avg(struct rq *rq, int runnable)
> >> {
> >> - __update_entity_runnable_avg(rq->clock_task, &rq->avg, runnable);
> >> + __update_entity_runnable_avg(rq->clock_task, &rq->avg, runnable,
> >> + runnable);
> >
> > Its not immediately obvious why we use @runnable for @running,
>
> Isn't it? An rq is the root of all scheduling -- if there are any
> runnable tasks than one of them better be running when this is called.
>
> I can add a comment to this effect.
Ah, indeed. Yes a comment would be good ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists