[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120220171453.GH5387@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:14:53 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Chris Blair <chris.blair@...ricsson.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] gpio/stmpe: support no-irq mode
Hi Linus,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:17:15PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Chris Blair <chris.blair@...ricsson.com>
>
> Adds support for boards which have an STMPE GPIO device without the
> interrupt pin connected. This means that no interrupt can be received
> but the GPIO pins can still be driven and read.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
> Tested-by: Michel Jaouen <michel.jaouen@...ricsson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Blair <chris.blair@...ricsson.com>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Removes the use of the new no_irq platform data member and
> instead uses the value obtained for the cell irq to know if irqs
> are supported or not. If irqs are not supported, the device
> will not have been given an irq resource and the irq value
> will be invalid.
>
> This depends on the previous patch to the MFD
> code so should better be merged into the MFD tree with the
> previous patch.
Ok, I'm taking this one. It would be nice to get Grant's ACK as well.
Linus, you did not SOB this one. Did you simply forget ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists