linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 20/22] mm: optimize putback for 0-order reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:23:50 +0400
From:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 20/22] mm: optimize putback for 0-order reclaim

At 0-order reclaim all pages are isolated from one lruvec,
thus we don't need to recheck and relock page_lruvec on putback.

Maybe it would be better to collect lumpy-isolated pages into
separate list and handle them independently.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   17 +++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 39b4525..b9bd6c7 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1342,6 +1342,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
  */
 static noinline_for_stack struct lruvec *
 putback_inactive_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+		       struct scan_control *sc,
 		       struct list_head *page_list)
 {
 	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
@@ -1364,8 +1365,10 @@ putback_inactive_pages(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 		}
 
 		/* can differ only on lumpy reclaim */
-		lruvec = __relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page);
-		reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
+		if (sc->order) {
+			lruvec = __relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page);
+			reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
+		}
 
 		SetPageLRU(page);
 		lru = page_lru(page);
@@ -1565,7 +1568,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
 		__count_vm_events(KSWAPD_STEAL, nr_reclaimed);
 	__count_zone_vm_events(PGSTEAL, zone, nr_reclaimed);
 
-	lruvec = putback_inactive_pages(lruvec, &page_list);
+	lruvec = putback_inactive_pages(lruvec, sc, &page_list);
 
 	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON, -nr_anon);
 	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, -nr_file);
@@ -1630,6 +1633,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
 
 static struct lruvec *
 move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
+			 struct scan_control *sc,
 			 struct list_head *list,
 			 struct list_head *pages_to_free,
 			 enum lru_list lru)
@@ -1655,7 +1659,8 @@ move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 		page = lru_to_page(list);
 
 		/* can differ only on lumpy reclaim */
-		lruvec = __relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page);
+		if (sc->order)
+			lruvec = __relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page);
 
 		VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page));
 		SetPageLRU(page);
@@ -1771,9 +1776,9 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 	 */
 	reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[file] += nr_rotated;
 
-	lruvec = move_active_pages_to_lru(lruvec, &l_active, &l_hold,
+	lruvec = move_active_pages_to_lru(lruvec, sc, &l_active, &l_hold,
 						LRU_ACTIVE + file * LRU_FILE);
-	lruvec = move_active_pages_to_lru(lruvec, &l_inactive, &l_hold,
+	lruvec = move_active_pages_to_lru(lruvec, sc, &l_inactive, &l_hold,
 						LRU_BASE   + file * LRU_FILE);
 	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
 	unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/