lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:37:20 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: Fix missed wakeup in I_NEW handling

Commit 250df6ed removed wake_up_inode() (in particular a memory barrier before
wake_up_bit()) on the basis that i_state transitions are protected by i_lock.
That would be fine if all the readers of i_state were using i_lock as well. But
wait_on_inode() doesn't use i_lock and thus the following can happen due to
reordering:

   CPU 1				CPU 2
unlock_new_inode()
  spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
  wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
					wait_on_inode()
					  wait_on_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
  inode->i_state &= ~I_NEW;
  ^^^ this store was reordered
  spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);

And waiter on CPU2 sleeps forever (or for a really long time).

We fix the issue by using i_lock in wait_on_inode() in the spirit of commit
250df6ed.

CC: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Eric Buddington <ebuddington@...leyan.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c                |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/writeback.h |    5 -----
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index fb10d86..e768f9e 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -954,6 +954,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_annotate_inode_mutex_key);
 #endif
 
 /**
+ * wait_on_inode - wait while inode is in I_NEW state
+ * @inode:	inode to wait for
+ *
+ * This function waits until inode is fully initialized and exits new state
+ */
+static void wait_on_inode(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wq, &inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
+	wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
+
+	might_sleep();
+	wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
+	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	while (inode->i_state & I_NEW) {
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+		__wait_on_bit(wqh, &wq, inode_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+}
+
+/**
  * unlock_new_inode - clear the I_NEW state and wake up any waiters
  * @inode:	new inode to unlock
  *
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index 995b8bf..e2dbc70 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -96,11 +96,6 @@ long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait);
 void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages, enum wb_reason reason);
 
 /* writeback.h requires fs.h; it, too, is not included from here. */
-static inline void wait_on_inode(struct inode *inode)
-{
-	might_sleep();
-	wait_on_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW, inode_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-}
 static inline void inode_sync_wait(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	might_sleep();
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ