[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329761755.2293.373.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:15:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:14 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I thought this was pretty much sorted. We want to prefer core over
> sibling, because on at laest some modern CPUs with L3, siblings suck
> rocks.
Yeah, I since figured out how its supposed (and supposedly) does work.
Suresh was a bit too clever and forgot to put a comment in since clearly
it was obvious at the time ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists