linux-kernel - Re: OF-related boot crash in 3.3.0-rc3-00188-g3ec1e88

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1202210030530.11350@math.ut.ee>
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:32:09 +0200 (EET)
From:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: OF-related boot crash in 3.3.0-rc3-00188-g3ec1e88

> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > Finished bisecting on the other machine too (Sun Fire V100 where strlen 
> > crashes):
> > 
> > 7bd0b0f0da3b1ec11cbcc798eb0ef747a1184077 is the first bad commit
> > commit 7bd0b0f0da3b1ec11cbcc798eb0ef747a1184077
> > Author: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Date:   Thu Dec 8 10:22:09 2011 -0800
> > 
> >     memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator
> >     
> >     Now that all early memory information is in memblock when enabled, we
> >     can implement reverse free area iterator and use it to implement NUMA
> >     aware allocator which is then wrapped for simpler variants instead of
> >     the confusing and inefficient mending of information in separate NUMA
> >     aware allocator.
> >     
> >     Implement for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(), use it to reimplement
> >     memblock_find_in_range_node() which in turn is used by all allocators.
> >     
> >     The visible allocator interface is inconsistent and can probably use
> >     some cleanup too.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> >     Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> >     Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> 
> Hmmm.... So, different bisection results from two machines?  That's a
> bit weird.  I *think* this bisection result makes more sense.  Can you
> please verify the bisection result on e2500 once more?

You were right. The first machine now bisects down to the same commit - 
I was confused by "0 revisions to test" and did not run the last step 
whe first bisecting.

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/