linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] COMPAT_USE_64BIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F41B2FD.9010705@zytor.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:42:05 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, hjl.tools@...il.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME v2

On 02/19/2012 06:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> 
> This is a respin of the COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME bits of the x32
> patchset.  It replaces patches 07/30-10/30 out of that patchset.
> 
> The differences in this respin are:
> 
> 1. Use helper functions as suggested by Linus, and
> 2. Add support in the networking stack (this bit got inadvertently
>    left out of the previous patchset.)
> 
> Linus, is this more what you were looking for?
> 
> This is the diffstat for this set:
> 

(And no, it doesn't even compile... working on that ;)

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/