linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] pch_udc: Specifies GPI port number at configuration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANKRQng1g_LHVcimKk16VK9SxkNBvC4ZqdThtVWLZgMjgp0KJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:27:59 +0900
From:	Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
	kok.howg.ewe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pch_udc: Specifies GPI port number at configuration.

2012年2月3日19:50 Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>:
>   Isn't it better to pass this with driver's platform data.

To define GPIO port number, we must I'm supporting IntelCrown Bay
platform （Intel AtomE600 + PCH EG20T).
I made an initialization code(attached) for the Crown Bay platform.
Should I post this module to upstream? I need your advice.
If I should do, could you tell me which category we should put
it?

---
ROHM Co., Ltd.
tomoya

View attachment "crownbay.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (1267 bytes)