[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120221083241.GC5156@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:02:41 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> [2012-02-21 06:43:18]:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 20:07 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:14 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > Enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE used to be decidedly too expensive to consider.
> > > Maybe that has changed, but I doubt it.
> >
> > Right, I through I remembered some such, you could see it on wakeup
> > heavy things like pipe-bench and that java msg passing thing, right?
>
> Yeah, it beat up switch heavy buddies pretty bad.
Do you have pointer to the java benchmark? Also is pipe-bench the same
as the one described below?
http://freecode.com/projects/pipebench
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists