[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329820643.2293.386.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:37:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 10:21 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I use vmark, find it _somewhat_ useful. Not a lovely benchmark, but it
> is highly affinity sensitive, and switches heftily. I don't put much
> value on it though, too extreme for me, but it is a ~decent indicator.
>
> There are no doubt _lots_ better than vmark for java stuff.
>
> I toss a variety pack at the box in obsessive-compulsive man mode when
> testing. Which benchmarks doesn't matter much, just need to be wide
> spectrum and consistent.
http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html
> No, I use Ingo's pipe-test, but that to measure fastpath overhead.
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/pipe-test.c
Also I think it lives as: perf bench sched pipe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists