[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbPeVBv5VWefDvib5HmGF0K2gT79Mx7g-yviyQj33+Z-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:03 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/gpio.txt: Explain expected pinctrl interaction
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
> Update gpio.txt based on recent discussions regarding interaction with the
> pinctrl subsystem.
>
> Previously, gpio_request() was described as explicitly not performing any
> required mux setup operations etc.
>
> Now, gpio_request() is explicitly as explicitly performing any required mux
> setup operations where possible. In the case it isn't, platform code is
> required to have set up any required muxing or other configuration prior to
> gpio_request() being called, in order to maintain the same semantics.
>
> This is achieved by gpiolib drivers calling e.g. pinctrl_request_gpio() in
> their .request() operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Grant can you take this one? I'd prefer for you to have a look at
it as well.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists