[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120221143538.GA2381@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:35:38 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
ddaney.cavm@...il.com, pjt@...gle.com, rth@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] jump label: introduce default true branch
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:51:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 14:47 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 12/21/2011 11:09 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > >
> > > I've introduced a new static_branch_def_true() construct, such that the straight
> > > line path is the true branch, and we patch a jump to get to the false branch.
> > > In order to make jump_label_inc()/dec() work as 'make true'/'make false' with
> > > counting, I've had to update some of the core jump label code. This patchset also
> > > introduces: JUMP_LABEL_INIT_TRUE/FALSE, so that keys should be initialized as:
> > >
> > > struct jump_label_key true_key = JUMP_LABEL_INIT_TRUE;
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > struct jump_label_key false_key = JUMP_LABEL_INIT_FALSE;
> > >
> > > I think this patch series should address the issues that came up with sched_feat()
> > > implementation.
> > >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Did this ever get addressed?
>
> I actually tried to push that stuff to Ingo, he figured it all should
> have different names. Jason and Ingo went back and forth for a while and
> afaik settled on something. Jason then went off to implement, but I
> haven't yet seen a new version.
>
>
I'll post a patch series later today.
Thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists