[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F43AC8D.5090508@hale.at>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:39:09 +0100
From: Michael Thalmeier <michael.thalmeier@...e.at>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, michael@...lmeier.at,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i.MX31: mxc-rnga: implement waiting for data in driver
On 2012-02-21 14:29, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Michael Thalmeier
> <michael.thalmeier@...e.at> wrote:
>
>> -static int mxc_rnga_data_present(struct hwrng *rng)
>> +static int mxc_rnga_data_present(struct hwrng *rng, int wait)
>
> This looks good, but ...
>
>> {
>> - int level;
>> + int level, i;
>> void __iomem *rng_base = (void __iomem *)rng->priv;
>>
>> - /* how many random numbers is in FIFO? [0-16] */
>> - level = ((__raw_readl(rng_base + RNGA_STATUS) &
>> - RNGA_STATUS_LEVEL_MASK) >> 8);
>> + for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
>
> Why the magic "20" here?
>
> It would be better to add a proper timeout mechanism instead, such as
> time_after(jiffies, timeout)
>
I am absolutely with you.
The point is only that this is the behaviour of nearly all hw_random
drivers, and I basically just copied it over into this driver.
--
Scanned by MailScanner.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists