[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BD8BC32F@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:50:18 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
"B29396@...escale.com" <B29396@...escale.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"dongas86@...il.com" <dongas86@...il.com>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"thomas.abraham@...aro.org" <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/20] pinctrl: Error if mapping table's control dev
can't be found
Linus Walleij wrote at Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:59 AM:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a serious error, and the pin control system will not function
> > correctly if it ends up not programing the mapping table entries into
> > the HW. Instead of just ignoring this, error out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
> Thanks applied, this came to bite me today so I see the value
> of being strict here.
>
> > + /* Eventually, this should trigger deferred probe */
> > + return -ENODEV;
>
> I changed this to ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) in my codebase as
> it returns a pointer.
Thanks. I thought I'd fixed that up after compiling each patch individually,
but I guess I missed one:-(
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists