linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:39:05 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	mingo@...e.hu, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	ddaney.cavm@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups
 + docs

On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:20 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:

> I'm not really too hung up on the naming, but I did think that
> very_[un]likely were an interesting possibility.

The problem comes from what Peter said. They are too similar to
"likely()" and "unlikely()", and can become confusing.

Maybe "static_likely()" and "static_unlikely()" as the word "static" can
imply something strange about these. Or perhaps a "const_likely()"?

Maybe "dynamic_branch_true()" and "dynamic_branch_false()". This may be
the most descriptive.

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/