linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add some --strict coding style checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120221130917.e41491d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:09:17 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com, linville@...driver.com,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add some --strict coding style checks

Speaking of which, I just got this:

WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu
#142: FILE: fs/locks.c:2335:
+                       seq_printf(f, "Start-end:\t %Ld-EOF\n\n", fl->fl_start);

But %L saves a byte!  Why did we do this?  Don't you like puppies?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/