[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F430230.1010505@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:32:16 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@...sung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i387: support lazy restore of FPU state
On 02/20/2012 06:18 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> Although I do wonder if we should just make kernel_fpu_begin() be a
>> real function instead of inlining it. I'm not sure it makes sense to
>> inline that thing, and it might be better to export that one instead.
>
> I do think that would be better in the long run, but for now here's an
> updated "trivial" patch to fix it.
>
There is actually another very good reason for out-of-lining
kernel_fpu_begin/_end: it will act as a compiler barrier i we ever do
compiler-generated SSE or AVX code, which we may very well want to do.
In fact, there may even be good reason for something like:
kernel_fpu_use(void (*func)(void *), void *arg);
... where the FPU-using stuff is actively embedded in the call.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists