[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwBD7pbOcSUVguF+vFAs85JhNpjJgZtDKjEJA0PVXrhkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:06:50 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, thomas@...3r.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.3-rc4
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
>
> I think the patch attached to your original post needs a little work if
> that is to be used. Correct me if I'm wrong but AFAICT there are more
> architectures that use 8-byte alignment than just x86-64, such as alpha,
> ia64 and ppc64 and I believe they may also be used in a compat mode.
The only issue is compat mode, and afaik, all other architectures
except for x86-32 do __u64 with natural alignment.
So all 64-bit architectures use natural alignment, the only issue is
the alignment of __u64 in 32-bit mode.
So it really is *not* about 8-byte alignment. Quite the reverse. It's
about 4-byte alignment of 64-bit entities, and I suspect x86-32 is the
only one that does that.
See "compat_u64", and notice how only in arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h
do we have
typedef u64 __attribute__((aligned(4))) compat_u64;
So it really is limited to only x86.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists