[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329802998.7333.1.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 06:43:18 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 20:07 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:14 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE used to be decidedly too expensive to consider.
> > Maybe that has changed, but I doubt it.
>
> Right, I through I remembered some such, you could see it on wakeup
> heavy things like pipe-bench and that java msg passing thing, right?
Yeah, it beat up switch heavy buddies pretty bad.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists