[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2boor33g8.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:19:19 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] mm: lru_lock splitting
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> writes:
Konstantin,
> There complete patch-set with my lru_lock splitting
> plus all related preparations and cleanups rebased to next-20120210
On large systems we're also seeing lock contention on the lru_lock
without using memcgs. Any thoughts how this could be extended for this
situation too?
Thanks,
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists