lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F44B06C.4050709@atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:07:56 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC:	plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	avictor.za@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: AIC and GPIO IRQ device tree initilization

On 02/21/2012 03:07 PM, Rob Herring :
> On 02/17/2012 03:27 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Both AIC and GPIO controllers are now using the standard of_irq_init()
>> function to initialize IRQs in case of DT use.
>> The DT specific initialization functions are now separated from the
>> non-DT case and are now using "linear" irq domains.
>> The .map() irqdomain operation is responsible for positioning the IRQ
>> handlers. In AIC case, the Linux IRQ number is directly programmed in
>> the hardware to avoid an additional reverse mapping operation.
>> The AIC position its irq domain as the "default" irq domain.
>>
>> For DT case, the priority is not yet filled in the SMR. It will be the
>> subject of another patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch goes on top of previous series:
>> "[PATCH 0/9] ARM: at91: irqdomain and device tree for AIC and GPIO"
>> (which goes on top of Grant's "irq_domain generalization and rework").
>>
>> It should address all advices by Rob Herring and I hope it is the best
>> way to deal with irq domains in all DT/non-DT cases.
>>
>> A simple concern is that the IRQ latency may be bigger because of the
>> irq_create_mapping() call in .to_irq(). This is called in the hot path
>> of GPIO IRQ handler...
> 
> 
> Why are you not using irq_find_mapping?

Hehe, good question ;-)
It should have been experimented at some point and forgotten... But you
are absolutely right, it is the way to go.

>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c |   11 +++-
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h  |    6 ++
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c     |  124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c      |   92 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>> index 6120978..e0df4e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/init.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>  
>>  #include <mach/hardware.h>
>> @@ -86,9 +88,16 @@ static void __init ek_add_device_nand(void)
>>  	at91_add_device_nand(&ek_nand_data);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static const struct of_device_id irq_of_match[] __initconst = {
>> +
>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-aic", .data = at91_aic_of_init },
>> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio", .data = at91_gpio_of_irq_setup },
>> +	{ /*sentinel*/ }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void __init at91_dt_init_irq(void)
>>  {
>> -	at91_init_irq_default();
>> +	of_irq_init(irq_of_match);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void __init at91_dt_device_init(void)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
>> index 78cd605..c5d16e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   */
>>  
>>  #include <linux/clkdev.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>  
>>   /* Map io */
>>  extern void __init at91_map_io(void);
>> @@ -25,6 +26,9 @@ extern void __init at91_init_irq_default(void);
>>  extern void __init at91_init_interrupts(unsigned int priority[]);
>>  extern void __init at91x40_init_interrupts(unsigned int priority[]);
>>  extern void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int priority[]);
>> +extern int  __init at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> +				    struct device_node *parent);
>> +
>>  
>>   /* Timer */
>>  struct sys_timer;
>> @@ -75,5 +79,7 @@ struct at91_gpio_bank {
>>  };
>>  extern void __init at91_gpio_init(struct at91_gpio_bank *, int nr_banks);
>>  extern void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void);
>> +extern int  __init at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> +					  struct device_node *parent);
>>  
>>  extern int at91_extern_irq;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> index fbcb47e..64395a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>  
>>  #include <mach/hardware.h>
>>  #include <mach/at91_pio.h>
>> @@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ struct at91_gpio_chip {
>>  	struct gpio_chip	chip;
>>  	struct at91_gpio_chip	*next;		/* Bank sharing same clock */
>>  	int			pioc_hwirq;	/* PIO bank interrupt identifier on AIC */
>> +	int			pioc_virq;	/* PIO bank Linux virtual interrupt */
>>  	int			pioc_idx;	/* PIO bank index */
>>  	void __iomem		*regbase;	/* PIO bank virtual address */
>>  	struct clk		*clock;		/* associated clock */
>> @@ -295,7 +297,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned state)
>>  	else
>>  		wakeups[bank] &= ~mask;
>>  
>> -	irq_set_irq_wake(gpio_chip[bank].pioc_hwirq, state);
>> +	irq_set_irq_wake(at91_gpio->pioc_virq, state);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -397,12 +399,12 @@ static struct irq_chip gpio_irqchip = {
>>  
>>  static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>>  {
>> -	unsigned	virq;
>>  	struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
>>  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
>>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata);
>>  	void __iomem	*pio = at91_gpio->regbase;
>> -	u32		isr;
>> +	unsigned long	isr;
>> +	int		n;
>>  
>>  	/* temporarily mask (level sensitive) parent IRQ */
>>  	chip->irq_ack(idata);
>> @@ -420,13 +422,10 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		virq = gpio_to_irq(at91_gpio->chip.base);
>> -
>> -		while (isr) {
>> -			if (isr & 1)
>> -				generic_handle_irq(virq);
>> -			virq++;
>> -			isr >>= 1;
>> +		n = find_first_bit(&isr, BITS_PER_LONG);
>> +		while (n < BITS_PER_LONG) {
>> +			generic_handle_irq(at91_gpiolib_to_irq(&at91_gpio->chip, n));
>> +			n = find_next_bit(&isr, BITS_PER_LONG, n + 1);
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  	chip->irq_unmask(idata);
>> @@ -496,23 +495,91 @@ postcore_initcall(at91_gpio_debugfs_init);
>>  /*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>  
>>  /*
>> + * This lock class tells lockdep that GPIO irqs are in a different
>> + * category than their parents, so it won't report false recursion.
>> + */
>> +static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> +static int at91_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
>> +							irq_hw_number_t hw)
>> +{
>> +	struct at91_gpio_chip	*at91_gpio = h->host_data;
>> +
>> +	irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &gpio_lock_class);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Can use the "simple" and not "edge" handler since it's
>> +	 * shorter, and the AIC handles interrupts sanely.
>> +	 */
>> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &gpio_irqchip,
>> +				 handle_simple_irq);
>> +	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID);
>> +	irq_set_chip_data(virq, at91_gpio);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct irq_domain_ops at91_gpio_ops = {
>> +	.map	= at91_gpio_irq_map,
>> +	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
>> +};
>> +
>> +int __init at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> +				     struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> +	struct at91_gpio_chip	*prev = NULL;
>> +	int			alias_idx = of_alias_get_id(node, "gpio");
>> +	struct at91_gpio_chip	*at91_gpio = &gpio_chip[alias_idx];
>> +
>> +	/* Disable irqs of this PIO controller */
>> +	__raw_writel(~0, at91_gpio->regbase + PIO_IDR);
>> +
>> +	/* Setup irq domain */
>> +	at91_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, at91_gpio->chip.ngpio,
>> +						&at91_gpio_ops, at91_gpio);
>> +	if (!at91_gpio->domain)
>> +		panic("at91_gpio.%d: couldn't allocate irq domain (DT).\n",
>> +			at91_gpio->pioc_idx);
>> +
>> +	/* Setup chained handler */
>> +	if (at91_gpio->pioc_idx)
>> +		prev = &gpio_chip[at91_gpio->pioc_idx - 1];
>> +
>> +	/* The toplevel handler handles one bank of GPIOs, except
>> +	 * on some SoC it can handles up to three...
>> +	 * We only set up the handler for the first of the list.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (prev && prev->next == at91_gpio)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	at91_gpio->pioc_virq = irq_create_mapping(irq_find_host(parent),
>> +							at91_gpio->pioc_hwirq);
>> +	irq_set_chip_data(at91_gpio->pioc_virq, at91_gpio);
>> +	irq_set_chained_handler(at91_gpio->pioc_virq, gpio_irq_handler);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +int __init at91_gpio_of_irq_setup(struct device_node *node,
>> +				     struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> +	return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * irqdomain initialization: pile up irqdomains on top of AIC range
>>   */
>>  static void __init at91_gpio_irqdomain(struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio)
>>  {
>>  	int irq_base;
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> -	struct device_node *of_node = at91_gpio->chip.of_node;
>> -#else
>> -	struct device_node *of_node = NULL;
>> -#endif
>>  
>>  	irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, at91_gpio->chip.ngpio, 0);
>>  	if (irq_base < 0)
>>  		panic("at91_gpio.%d: error %d: couldn't allocate IRQ numbers.\n",
>>  			at91_gpio->pioc_idx, irq_base);
>> -	at91_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(of_node,
>> -						  at91_gpio->chip.ngpio,
>> +	at91_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(NULL, at91_gpio->chip.ngpio,
>>  						  irq_base, 0,
>>  						  &irq_domain_simple_ops, NULL);
>>  	if (!at91_gpio->domain)
>> @@ -521,12 +588,6 @@ static void __init at91_gpio_irqdomain(struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /*
>> - * This lock class tells lockdep that GPIO irqs are in a different
>> - * category than their parents, so it won't report false recursion.
>> - */
>> -static struct lock_class_key gpio_lock_class;
>> -
>> -/*
>>   * Called from the processor-specific init to enable GPIO interrupt support.
>>   */
>>  void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>> @@ -538,8 +599,7 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>>  	for (pioc = 0, this = gpio_chip, prev = NULL;
>>  			pioc++ < gpio_banks;
>>  			prev = this, this++) {
>> -		unsigned	pioc_hwirq = this->pioc_hwirq;
>> -		int		offset;
>> +		int offset;
>>  
>>  		__raw_writel(~0, this->regbase + PIO_IDR);
>>  
>> @@ -547,7 +607,7 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>>  		at91_gpio_irqdomain(this);
>>  
>>  		for (offset = 0; offset < this->chip.ngpio; offset++) {
>> -			unsigned int virq = irq_find_mapping(this->domain, offset);
>> +			unsigned int virq = irq_create_mapping(this->domain, offset);
> 
> This should get done by irq_domain_add_legacy.

Yes, I revert this to irq_find_mapping().


>>  			irq_set_lockdep_class(virq, &gpio_lock_class);
>>  
>>  			/*
>> @@ -569,8 +629,9 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
>>  		if (prev && prev->next == this)
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		irq_set_chip_data(pioc_hwirq, this);
>> -		irq_set_chained_handler(pioc_hwirq, gpio_irq_handler);
>> +		this->pioc_virq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, this->pioc_hwirq);
>> +		irq_set_chip_data(this->pioc_virq, this);
>> +		irq_set_chained_handler(this->pioc_virq, gpio_irq_handler);
>>  	}
>>  	pr_info("AT91: %d gpio irqs in %d banks\n", gpio_irqnbr, gpio_banks);
>>  }
>> @@ -648,7 +709,12 @@ static void at91_gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *chip)
>>  static int at91_gpiolib_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>>  {
>>  	struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = to_at91_gpio_chip(chip);
>> -	int virq = irq_find_mapping(at91_gpio->domain, offset);
>> +	int virq;
>> +
>> +	if (offset < chip->ngpio)
>> +		virq = irq_create_mapping(at91_gpio->domain, offset);
>> +	else
>> +		virq = -ENXIO;
>>  
>>  	dev_dbg(chip->dev, "%s: request IRQ for GPIO %d, return %d\n",
>>  				chip->label, offset + chip->base, virq);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
>> index 46682fa..2e4ee09 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c
>> @@ -135,27 +135,72 @@ static struct irq_chip at91_aic_chip = {
>>  	.irq_set_wake	= at91_aic_set_wake,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static void __init at91_aic_hw_init(unsigned int spu_vector)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Perform 8 End Of Interrupt Command to make sure AIC
>> +	 * will not Lock out nIRQ
>> +	 */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
>> +		at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_EOICR, 0);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Spurious Interrupt ID in Spurious Vector Register.
>> +	 * When there is no current interrupt, the IRQ Vector Register
>> +	 * reads the value stored in AIC_SPU
>> +	 */
>> +	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SPU, spu_vector);
>> +
>> +	/* No debugging in AIC: Debug (Protect) Control Register */
>> +	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_DCR, 0);
>> +
>> +	/* Disable and clear all interrupts initially */
>> +	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_IDCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_ICCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +
> 
> Remove extra blank lines.

Sure, done.

>>  #if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>> -static int __init __at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> -				     struct device_node *parent)
>> +static int at91_aic_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
>> +							irq_hw_number_t hw)
>>  {
>> -	at91_aic_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> -	at91_aic_np = node;
>> +	/* Put virq number in Source Vector Register */
>> +	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SVR(hw), virq);
>> +
>> +	/* Active Low interrupt, without priority */
>> +	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SMR(hw), AT91_AIC_SRCTYPE_LOW);
>> +
>> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &at91_aic_chip, handle_level_irq);
>> +	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static const struct of_device_id aic_ids[] __initconst = {
>> -	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-aic", .data = __at91_aic_of_init },
>> -	{ /*sentinel*/ }
>> +static struct irq_domain_ops at91_aic_irq_ops = {
>> +	.map	= at91_aic_irq_map,
>> +	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static void __init at91_aic_of_init(void)
>> +int __init at91_aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> +				     struct device_node *parent)
>>  {
>> -	of_irq_init(aic_ids);
>> +	at91_aic_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> +	at91_aic_np = node;
>> +
>> +	at91_aic_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(at91_aic_np, NR_AIC_IRQS,
>> +						&at91_aic_irq_ops, NULL);
>> +	if (!at91_aic_domain)
>> +		panic("Unable to add AIC irq domain (DT)\n");
>> +
>> +	irq_set_default_host(at91_aic_domain);
> 
> Is this really necessary? I don't think it should be.

Well, it allows me to retreive the IRQ controller domain from the gpio
driver.
Cf. at91_gpio_irq_setup() with the call to
irq_create_mapping(NULL, xxx) just above.

Is there a better way to do this?
(it seems that irq_find_host() is dedicated to the device tree enabled
configuration).

>> +	at91_aic_hw_init(NR_AIC_IRQS);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>> -#else
>> -static void __init at91_aic_of_init(void) {}
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -166,11 +211,7 @@ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int priority[NR_AIC_IRQS])
>>  	unsigned int i;
>>  	int irq_base;
>>  
>> -	if (of_have_populated_dt())
>> -		at91_aic_of_init();
>> -	else
>> -		at91_aic_base = ioremap(AT91_AIC, 512);
>> -
>> +	at91_aic_base = ioremap(AT91_AIC, 512);
>>  	if (!at91_aic_base)
>>  		panic("Unable to ioremap AIC registers\n");
>>  
>> @@ -187,6 +228,8 @@ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int priority[NR_AIC_IRQS])
>>  	if (!at91_aic_domain)
>>  		panic("Unable to add AIC irq domain\n");
>>  
>> +	irq_set_default_host(at91_aic_domain);
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * The IVR is used by macro get_irqnr_and_base to read and verify.
>>  	 * The irq number is NR_AIC_IRQS when a spurious interrupt has occurred.
>> @@ -199,22 +242,7 @@ void __init at91_aic_init(unsigned int priority[NR_AIC_IRQS])
>>  
>>  		irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &at91_aic_chip, handle_level_irq);
>>  		set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>> -
>> -		/* Perform 8 End Of Interrupt Command to make sure AIC will not Lock out nIRQ */
>> -		if (i < 8)
>> -			at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_EOICR, 0);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Spurious Interrupt ID in Spurious Vector Register is NR_AIC_IRQS
>> -	 * When there is no current interrupt, the IRQ Vector Register reads the value stored in AIC_SPU
>> -	 */
>> -	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_SPU, NR_AIC_IRQS);
>> -
>> -	/* No debugging in AIC: Debug (Protect) Control Register */
>> -	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_DCR, 0);
>> -
>> -	/* Disable and clear all interrupts initially */
>> -	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_IDCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> -	at91_aic_write(AT91_AIC_ICCR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>> +	at91_aic_hw_init(NR_AIC_IRQS);
>>  }


Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ