[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120222092745.GA30339@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:27:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_shared_map to a field
in struct cpuinfo_x86
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 05:45 PM, Kevin Winchester wrote:
> > Commit 141168c36cde ("x86: Simplify code by removing a !SMP #ifdefs from
> > 'struct cpuinfo_x86'") caused the compilation error:
> >
> > mce_amd.c:(.cpuinit.text+0x4723): undefined reference to 'cpu_llc_shared_map'
> >
> > by removing an #ifdef CONFIG_SMP around a block containing a
> > reference to cpu_llc_shared_map. Rather than replace the
> > #ifdef, move cpu_llc_shared_map to be a new cpumask_t field
> > llc_shared_map in struct cpuinfo_x86 and adjust all
> > references to cpu_llc_shared_map.
> >
>
> I'm not comfortable with a patch this large after we are
> already at -rc4. Please send a minimal patch to fix the
> failure for v3.3, and then a patch on top of that which we can
> queue up with the rest of the patchset to for v3.4.
I forgot about the v3.3 aspect of the series - yes, you are
right, doing it like that would be preferred.
It can all be in the same series, we'll sort apart the v3.3 and
v3.4 bits.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists