[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120222140526.GE26845@aftab>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:05:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
edac-devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAS trace event proto
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:32:16AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> So, in other words, I think that the _best_ way to represent an MCA
> type of error is to use an event with the following prototype:
No, it's not.
And if you're going to repeat yourself for the 100th time as to why,
don't even bother replying.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists