[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4527D3.9040906@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:37:23 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
CC: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Fix unaligned access and endian issues
On 02/22/2012 08:44 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2012-02-22 14:00 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
>> From: Matt Fleming<matt.fleming@...el.com>
>>
>> We need to read from and write to 'buf' a byte at a time otherwise
>> it's possible we'll perform an unaligned access, which can lead to a
>> segfault when cross-building an x86 kernel on risc architectures.
>>
>> Also, we may need to convert the endianness of the data we read
>> from/write to buf, so let's add some helper functions to do that.
> [...]
>> +static inline u32 read32_le(u8 *src)
>> +{
>> + u32 data;
>> +
>> + data = *src++;
>> + data |= *src++<< 8;
>> + data |= *src++<< 16;
>> + data |= *src++<< 24;
>> +
>> + return data;
>> +}
>
> We already have get_unaligned_le32 in<asm/unaligned.h> for this.
>
>> +
>> +static inline void write32_le(u8 *dst, u32 data)
>> +{
>> + *dst++ = data;
>> + *dst++ = data>> 8;
>> + *dst++ = data>> 16;
>> + *dst++ = data>> 24;
>> +}
>
> Similarly, put_unaligned_le32.
>
This is user space; those headers are not exported. However, sticking
to the same name would be good.
I'm wondering if this is the kind of things that should be put in
usr/include?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists