| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABqD9hY-aCqfkk4hO-N0oQUP8UyTZBm3Vads+i658Y1DwACEPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:47:56 -0600
From: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, pmoore@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
markus@...omium.org, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v10 09/11] ptrace,seccomp: Add
PTRACE_SECCOMP support
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu> wrote:
> On Tue, February 21, 2012 18:30, Will Drewry wrote:
>> A new return value is added to seccomp filters that allows
>> the system call policy for the affected system calls to be
>> implemented by a ptrace(2)ing process.
>>
>> If a tracer attaches to a task, specifies the PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP
>> option, then PTRACE_CONT.
>
> Awkward formulation here. I'd start with "If a tracer sets the
> PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP option, then ..."
>
>> After doing so, the tracer will
>> be notified if a seccomp filter program returns SECCOMP_RET_TRACE.
>
> This means that strace and gdb won't see seccomp filtered syscalls.
> I think you have to reverse the logic and have an option that asks
> to hide normal SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO, but not SECCOMP_RET_TRACE ones.
>
> That gives the expected behaviour in all cases: Programs not setting
> it behave as they do now, and co-operating tracers can ignore syscall
> events they're not interested in.
Reversing the logic resolves the slow-path/fast-path problem too. I'll
repost. This will make the code much saner I think!
>> If there is no seccomp event tracer, SECCOMP_RET_TRACE system calls will
>> return a -ENOSYS errno to user space. If the tracer detaches during a
>> hand-off, the process will be killed.
>>
>> To ensure that seccomp is syscall fast-path friendly in the future,
>> ptrace is delegated to by setting TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE. Since seccomp
>> events are equivalent to system call entry events, this allows for
>> seccomp to be evaluated as a fork off the fast-path and only,
>> optionally, jump to the slow path. When the tracer is notified, all
>> will function as with ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALLS), but when the tracer calls
>> ptrace(PTRACE_CONT), TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE will be unset and the task
>> will proceed just receiving PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP events.
>
> Please, no. That's making it more complicated than necessary.
>
> I propose to keep the ptrace rules exactly the same as they are, with
> the only change being that if PTRACE_O_SECCOMP is set, no syscall events
> will be generated for SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO. This way ptrace behaviour is
> the same, but only less syscall events are received. With your way
> ptracers see syscall events when they normally wouldn't.
>
>>
>> I realize there are pending patches for cleaning up ptrace events.
>> I can either reintegrate with those when they are available or
>> vice versa. That's assuming these changes make sense and are viable.
>>
>> v10: - moved to PTRACE_O_SECCOMP / PT_TRACE_SECCOMP
>> v9: - n/a
>> v8: - guarded PTRACE_SECCOMP use with an ifdef
>> v7: - introduced
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> arch/Kconfig | 4 +++
>> include/linux/ptrace.h | 7 ++++-
>> include/linux/seccomp.h | 14 +++++++++--
>> include/linux/tracehook.h | 7 +++++-
>> kernel/ptrace.c | 4 +++
>> kernel/seccomp.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 6 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
>> index 6d6d9dc..02c18ca 100644
>> --- a/arch/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
>> @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
>> bool
>> help
>> This symbol should be selected by an architecure if it provides:
>> + linux/tracehook.h, for TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE and ptrace_report_syscall
>> asm/syscall.h:
>> - syscall_get_arch()
>> - syscall_get_arguments()
>> @@ -211,6 +212,9 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
>> SIGSYS siginfo_t support must be implemented.
>> __secure_computing_int()/secure_computing()'s return value must be
>> checked, with -1 resulting in the syscall being skipped.
>> + If secure_computing is not in the system call slow path, the thread
>> + info flags will need to be checked upon exit to ensure delegation to
>> + ptrace(2) did not occur, or if it did, jump to the slow-path.
>>
>> config SECCOMP_FILTER
>> def_bool y
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ptrace.h b/include/linux/ptrace.h
>> index c2f1f6a..2fccdbc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ptrace.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h
>> @@ -62,8 +62,9 @@
>> #define PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC 0x00000010
>> #define PTRACE_O_TRACEVFORKDONE 0x00000020
>> #define PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT 0x00000040
>> +#define PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP 0x00000080
>>
>> -#define PTRACE_O_MASK 0x0000007f
>> +#define PTRACE_O_MASK 0x000000ff
>>
>> /* Wait extended result codes for the above trace options. */
>> #define PTRACE_EVENT_FORK 1
>> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@
>> #define PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE 5
>> #define PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT 6
>> #define PTRACE_EVENT_STOP 7
>> +#define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 8 /* never directly delivered */
>>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>>
>> @@ -101,8 +103,9 @@
>> #define PT_TRACE_EXEC PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC)
>> #define PT_TRACE_VFORK_DONE PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE)
>> #define PT_TRACE_EXIT PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT)
>> +#define PT_TRACE_SECCOMP PT_EVENT_FLAG(PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)
>>
>> -#define PT_TRACE_MASK 0x000003f4
>> +#define PT_TRACE_MASK 0x00000ff4
>>
>> /* single stepping state bits (used on ARM and PA-RISC) */
>> #define PT_SINGLESTEP_BIT 31
>> diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
>> index d039b7b..16887c1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
>> @@ -19,8 +19,9 @@
>> * selects the least permissive choice.
>> */
>> #define SECCOMP_RET_KILL 0x00000000U /* kill the task immediately */
>> -#define SECCOMP_RET_TRAP 0x00020000U /* disallow and send sigtrap */
>> -#define SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO 0x00030000U /* returns an errno */
>> +#define SECCOMP_RET_TRAP 0x00020000U /* only send sigtrap */
>> +#define SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO 0x00030000U /* only return an errno */
>> +#define SECCOMP_RET_TRACE 0x7ffe0000U /* allow, but notify the tracer */
>> #define SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW 0x7fff0000U /* allow */
>>
>> /* Masks for the return value sections. */
>> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ struct seccomp_filter;
>> *
>> * @mode: indicates one of the valid values above for controlled
>> * system calls available to a process.
>> + * @in_trace: indicates a seccomp filter hand off to ptrace has occurred
>> * @filter: The metadata and ruleset for determining what system calls
>> * are allowed for a task.
>> *
>> @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@ struct seccomp_filter;
>> */
>> struct seccomp {
>> int mode;
>> + int in_trace;
>> struct seccomp_filter *filter;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -116,15 +119,20 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
>> extern void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *);
>> extern void copy_seccomp(struct seccomp *child,
>> const struct seccomp *parent);
>> +extern void seccomp_tracer_done(void);
>> #else /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
>> /* The macro consumes the ->filter reference. */
>> #define put_seccomp_filter(_s) do { } while (0)
>> -
>> static inline void copy_seccomp(struct seccomp *child,
>> const struct seccomp *prev)
>> {
>> return;
>> }
>> +
>> +static inline void seccomp_tracer_done(void)
>> +{
>> + return;
>> +}
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
>> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>> #endif /* _LINUX_SECCOMP_H */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tracehook.h b/include/linux/tracehook.h
>> index a71a292..5000169 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/tracehook.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/tracehook.h
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> #include <linux/security.h>
>> struct linux_binprm;
>>
>> @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> int ptrace = current->ptrace;
>>
>> if (!(ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
>> - return;
>> + goto out;
>>
>> ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP | ((ptrace & PT_TRACESYSGOOD) ? 0x80 : 0));
>>
>> @@ -72,6 +73,10 @@ static inline void ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> send_sig(current->exit_code, current, 1);
>> current->exit_code = 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + if (ptrace & PT_TRACE_SECCOMP)
>> + seccomp_tracer_done();
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
>> index 00ab2ca..61e5ac4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #include <linux/signal.h>
>> #include <linux/audit.h>
>> #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>> +#include <linux/seccomp.h>
>> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> #include <linux/regset.h>
>> @@ -551,6 +552,9 @@ static int ptrace_setoptions(struct task_struct *child, unsigned
> long data)
>> if (data & PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT)
>> child->ptrace |= PT_TRACE_EXIT;
>>
>> + if (data & PTRACE_O_TRACESECCOMP)
>> + child->ptrace |= PT_TRACE_SECCOMP;
>> +
>> return (data & ~PTRACE_O_MASK) ? -EINVAL : 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
>> index fc25d3a..120ceec 100644
>> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
>> @@ -270,13 +270,12 @@ void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *orig)
>> * @child: forkee's seccomp
>> * @prev: forker's seccomp
>> *
>> - * Ensures that @child inherits seccomp mode and state if
>> - * seccomp filtering is in use.
>> + * Ensures that @child inherits seccomp filtering if in use.
>> */
>> void copy_seccomp(struct seccomp *child,
>> const struct seccomp *prev)
>> {
>> - child->mode = prev->mode;
>> + /* Other fields are handled by dup_task_struct. */
>> child->filter = get_seccomp_filter(prev->filter);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -299,6 +298,31 @@ static void seccomp_send_sigsys(int syscall, int reason)
>> info.si_syscall = syscall;
>> force_sig_info(SIGSYS, &info, current);
>> }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * seccomp_tracer_done: handles clean up after handing off to ptrace.
>> + *
>> + * Checks that the hand off from SECCOMP_RET_TRACE to ptrace was not
>> + * subject to a race condition where the tracer disappeared or was
>> + * never notified because of a pending SIGKILL.
>> + * N.b., if ptrace_syscall_entry returned an int, this call could just
>> + * disable the system call rather than using do_exit on tracer death.
>> + */
>> +void seccomp_tracer_done(void)
>> +{
>> + struct seccomp *s = ¤t->seccomp;
>> + /* Some other slow-path call occurred */
>> + if (!s->in_trace)
>
> So I guess it's more like 'check_trace' or something.
Yup - but I think this whole thing can go now.
>> + return;
>> + s->in_trace = 0;
>> + /* Tracer detached/died at some point after handing off to ptrace. */
>> + if (!(current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
>> + do_exit(SIGKILL);
>
> This isn't possible, because seccomp_tracer_done() is only called when
> PT_TRACE_SECCOMP is set, which gets cleared when the tracer goes away.
Well it's still a race. What I should be checking is
current->seccomp.mode == 2 then, once called, check if in_trace is 1.
I'll rework this whole thing with the inverted logic. It is much more appealing.
>> + /* If there is a SIGKILL pending, just do_exit. */
>> + if (sigismember(¤t->pending.signal, SIGKILL) ||
>> + sigismember(¤t->signal->shared_pending.signal, SIGKILL))
>> + do_exit(SIGKILL);
>
> This bit shouldn't be necessary, as it should be in ptrace core. Oleg's
> fix should be upstream before your seccomp patches. Except if I missed
> something and this is not to fix current buggy behaviour that the task
> is only killed after the current syscall?
Cool. The old behavior is the task being killed after the current
syscall. Any new behavior should fix this I hope :)
> But you got the logic reversed, the task should be killed except if
> seccomp_tracer_done() was called. You can't kill the task from within
> seccomp_tracer_done(), that is unreliable.
Yeah - this is pretty ugly no matter which why you slice it.
>> +}
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -360,6 +384,28 @@ int __secure_computing_int(int this_syscall)
>> seccomp_send_sigsys(this_syscall, reason_code);
>> return -1;
>> }
>> + case SECCOMP_RET_TRACE:
>> + /* If there is no interested tracer, return ENOSYS. */
>> + if (!(current->ptrace & PT_TRACE_SECCOMP))
>> + return -1;
>> + /*
>> + * Delegate to TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE. This allows fast-path
>> + * seccomp calls to delegate to slow-path if needed.
>> + * Since TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE will be unset on ptrace(2)
>> + * continuation, there should be no direct side
>> + * effects. If TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE is already set, this
>> + * has no effect. Upon completion of handling, ptrace
>> + * will call seccomp_tracer_done() which helps handle
>> + * races.
>> + */
>> + set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
>> + current->seccomp.in_trace = 1;
>> + /*
>> + * Allow the call, but upon completion, ptrace will
>> + * call seccomp_tracer_done to handle tracer
>> + * disappearance/death to ensure notification occurred.
>> + */
>> + return 0;
>> case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
>> return 0;
>> case SECCOMP_RET_KILL:
>> --
>
Thanks!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists