linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120223003706.GA3246@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:37:06 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Raphael Prevost <raphael@...o.asia>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:25:42PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:14 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> >
> > Immediate failure, still.
> 
> Damn, I'll have to look closer at what else is missing then.
> 
> I really didn't want to back-port the whole series as-is, but that
> would certainly have been easier.

I can do that, it wouldn't be that hard, just give me the git commit
ids to apply.

I can do a release with just these fixes in it if you think that would
make it easier to test/verify.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/