[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120223112005.GA7645@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:50:05 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2012-02-23 16:19:59]:
> > Enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE used to be decidedly too expensive to consider.
> > Maybe that has changed, but I doubt it. (general aside: testing with a
> > bloated distro config is a big mistake)
>
> I am seeing 2.6% _improvement_ in volanomark score by enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE
> at SMT/MC domains.
Ditto with pipe benchmark.
> Machine : 2 Quad-core Intel X5570 CPU (H/T enabled)
> Kernel : tip (HEAD at 6241cc8)
"perf bench sched pipe" was run 10 times and average ops/sec score
alongwith std. dev is noted as below.
SD_BALANCE_WAKE SD_BALANCE_WAKE
disabled enabled
Avg. score 108984.900 111844.300 (+2.6%)
std dev 20383.457 21668.604
Note:
SD_BALANCE_WAKE for SMT/MC domain was enabled by writing into appropriate
flags file present in /proc:
# cd /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/
# for i in `find . -name flags | grep domain1`; do echo 4671 > $i; done
# for i in `find . -name flags | grep domain0`; do echo 703 > $i; done
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists