[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzRQJ8YeZGnbq=OO0YgzkfrcS4r+G1cJbjtDCZe=t6DNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:56:55 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, autofs@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I think your wrong this time.
Well, that would be good, actually. Doing the test itself at mount
time is certainly the simpler approach.
>> The autofs "mount" is done by fork + execve("mount").
>
> It's done like this when mounting things inside an already mounted
> indirect autofs mount or when mounting things on autofs direct mount
> triggers but, in version 5, mount(2) has always used to mount autofs
> file systems.
Is that true for legacy autofs daemons too that distros ship? Because
those are the ones we'd be fighting..
Because when I do
git grep '\<mount[ ]*(' -- '*.[ch]'
(that's a space and a tab in that pattern) on the autofs-4.1.4 sources
I downloaded, I don't see a single call to mount. But I do see
spawning of PATH_MOUNT. And one of them is with "-t", "autofs".
So at least in the last version of autofs4, it was executing the
external "mount" program, not using mount(2).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists