linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:19:20 +0100
From:	Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:	DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> wrote:
> Eugeni Dodonov (4):
>      drm/i915: gen7: implement rczunit workaround
>      drm/i915: gen7: Implement an L3 caching workaround.
>      drm/i915: gen7: work around a system hang on IVB
>      drm/i915: do not enable RC6p on Sandy Bridge

That last patch about RC6p looks wrong.

It does:
 GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6_ENABLE |
			(IS_GEN7(dev_priv->dev)) ? GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6p_ENABLE : 0;
But I think this was meant:
 GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6_ENABLE |
			((IS_GEN7(dev_priv->dev)) ? GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6p_ENABLE : 0);

Or did I get the operator precedence wrong?

HTH

Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/