[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120223203241.GJ19691@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:32:41 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:59:44PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Trying to make all the controllers uniform in terms of their treatment
> > of cgroup hiearchy sounds like a good thing to do.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Apart from nesting cgroups, there're other inconsistencies.
>
> - Some controllers disallow more than one cgroup layer. That's the new
> net_prio controller, and I don't know why it's made so, but I guess
> it's fine to eliminate this restriction.
You mean don't allow creating deeper levels in cgroup hierarcy? That will
fail with libvirt + systemd as they create much deeper levels. I had to
change that for blkio.
>
> - Some controllers move resource charges when a task is moved to
> a different cgroup, but some don't?
I think in case of some controllers it does not even apply. For cpu, blkio
resources are renewable, so there is no moving around of charges.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists