[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120223205805.GA31838@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:58:05 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] acpi: Fix unprotected smp_processor_id() in
acpi_processor_cst_has_changed()
The acpi_processor_cst_has_changed() function is invoked from a
CPU_ONLINE or CPU_DEAD function, which might well execute on CPU 0
even though the CPU being hotplugged is some other CPU. In addition,
acpi_processor_cst_has_changed() invokes smp_processor_id() without
protection, resulting in splats when onlining CPUs.
This commit therefore changes the smp_processor_id() to pr->id, as is
used elsewhere in the code, for example, in acpi_processor_add().
This works for me, but I don't claim to understand ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 0e8e2de..9e57b06 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1159,8 +1159,7 @@ int acpi_processor_cst_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr)
* to make the code that updates C-States be called once.
*/
- if (smp_processor_id() == 0 &&
- cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver) {
+ if (pr->id == 0 && cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver) {
cpuidle_pause_and_lock();
/* Protect against cpu-hotplug */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists