lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:22:15 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/25] irq_domain/x86: Convert x86 (embedded) to use common irq_domain On 02/23/2012 08:56 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Grant Likely<grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior >> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote: >>> * Grant Likely | 2012-01-30 12:58:42 [-0700]: >>> >>>> Ugh. This isn't easy. The legacy mapping really needs all the >>> >>> Feel free to merge this patch. I don't have the time to look at this now >>> so I take a look at the ioapic later. >> >> There's no rush here. I can leave it as-is with IRQ_DOMAIN turned off >> for x86 for now. > > Turns out I have to enable IRQ_DOMAIN for x86 because the TI TWL4030 > driver needs it. I do need to apply this patch. Until something > better can be implemented, can I change ioapic_add_ofnode() so that it > allocates all irq_descs immediately. It's not ideal, but every other > approach I've looked at results in nasty hacks. > > Looking at the ioapic code, it appears to handle preallocated > irq_descs gracefully. Please merge your initial patch as-it. > Does adding this loop help (apologies if it is whitespace damaged, I > cut&paste it): > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c > index 3ae2ced..89c1310 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c > @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ const struct irq_domain_ops ioapic_irq_domain_ops = { > static void __init ioapic_add_ofnode(struct device_node *np) > { > struct resource r; > - int i, ret; > + int i, j, ret; > > ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0,&r); > if (ret) { > @@ -361,6 +361,14 @@ static void __init ioapic_add_ofnode(struct > device_node *np) > > gsi_cfg = mp_ioapic_gsi_routing(i); > > + /* > + * Preallocate irq_descs so that the legacy mapping > + * works, but don't set them up. > + * io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once() will finish the set up. > + */ > + for (j = 0; j< 32; j++) It is not 32. If I remember correctly the first ioapic had 24 pins so did the second. This is ioapic specifc. > > g. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists