[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyaPY9xsDGDx0QqRR2gV_z541w_xXeQbh5Uknd26cvXCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:17:03 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Or we can rely on the fact that sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
> and assume that ->whead is always rcu-protected if it can go away.
>
> In this case we don't need 3/4 (although it makes sense to add the
> fat comment), and 4/4 can be simplified, see below.
Ok.
Can you also get rid of 1/4, because quite frankly, adding that
BUG_ON() is just annoying. Either the thing gets fixed or not, but at
no point is it ok to say "ok, I'm going to fix it, but before I do
I'll just make it much worse".
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists