lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -0500
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	vapier@...too.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps

Hi

This version makes sense to me. and I verified this change don't break
procps tools.

But,

> +int vm_is_stack(struct task_struct *task,
> +                             struct vm_area_struct *vma, int in_group)
> +{
> +       if (vm_is_stack_for_task(task, vma))
> +               return 1;
> +
> +       if (in_group) {
> +               struct task_struct *t = task;
> +               while_each_thread(task, t) {

How protect this loop from task exiting? AFAIK, while_each_thread
require rcu_read_lock or task_list_lock.


> +                       if (vm_is_stack_for_task(t, vma))
> +                               return 1;
> +               }
> +       }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists