| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120223235450.GA22345@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:54:50 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Raphael Prevost <raphael@...o.asia>, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:18:03PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/23/2012 03:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > And a "clean" 3.2.7 doesn't have that problem? > > > > Does the same thing happen in Linus's tree at the moment? > > > > Clean 3.2.7 I don't think has that problem, although of course when I > run the stress test it fails on other ways so it's hard to 100% rule out. > > Linus' tree doesn't have that problems. Ugh. So, we need more testers, so let me release a -rc kernel with just these changes in it, to get a wider testing range, and make an easy "this kernel worked, but this one didn't" for people to work with. I don't suppose that 'git bisect' would work for this, as it's really a "all or nothing" type thing with this series from what I can tell, right? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists