[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b90acba-a8e9-485a-b2a6-608d61751f2c@email.android.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:31:38 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>, Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
autofs@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update
However, I liked Linus' approach.of using the version ioctl; any reason not to?
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:21 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:48 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 08:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
>wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Oh, DOH ...
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The process mounting the autofs mount is passing the pipe it
>will use
>> > > > > for communication via a mount option so we can do this right
>in
>> > > > > fill_super.
>> > > >
>> > > > No, we really cannot.
>> > >
>> > > Sorry, I think your wrong this time.
>> >
>> > On second thought, I suppose other user space users don't "have" to
>use
>> > mount(2) ....
>>
>> Thomas, what does systemd use to mount the autofs mounts that it
>uses?
>
>Mmm ... AFAICS systemd uses mount(2) so that looks OK too.
>
>Ian
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists