lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZWu_nYkWLxXBUv-VAQTMByDM37qACRf3im7R4GQgZc5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:09:11 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, B29396@...escale.com,
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, dongas86@...il.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	thomas.abraham@...aro.org, tony@...mide.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: Introduce PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT define, and
 use it

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:

> This provides a single centralized name for the default state.
>
> Update PIN_MAP_* macros to use this state name, instead of requiring the
> user to pass a state name in.
>
> Update documentation and mapping tables to use this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>

I like the direction this is taking for sure. This is however not
working because
it break U300, no hogs nor device requests work after this patch so I cannot
apply it.

I folded in this:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c
index 57ef1e6..ac12e08 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c
@@ -1612,9 +1612,9 @@ static struct pinctrl_map __initdata u300_pinmux_map[] = {
        PIN_MAP_SYS_HOG("pinmux-u300", "emif0"),
        PIN_MAP_SYS_HOG("pinmux-u300", "emif1"),
        /* per-device maps for MMC/SD, SPI and UART */
-       PIN_MAP("MMCSD", "pinctrl-u300", "mmc0", "mmci"),
-       PIN_MAP("SPI", "pinctrl-u300", "spi0", "pl022"),
-       PIN_MAP("UART0", "pinctrl-u300", "uart0", "uart0"),
+       PIN_MAP(PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-u300", "mmc0", "mmci"),
+       PIN_MAP(PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-u300", "spi0", "pl022"),
+       PIN_MAP(PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-u300", "uart0", "uart0"),
 };

 struct u300_mux_hog {
@@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ static int __init u300_pinctrl_fetch(void)
                struct pinctrl *p;
                int ret;

-               p = pinctrl_get(u300_mux_hogs[i].dev, NULL);
+               p = pinctrl_get(u300_mux_hogs[i].dev, PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT);
                if (IS_ERR(p)) {
                        pr_err("u300: could not get pinmux hog %s\n",
                               u300_mux_hogs[i].name);


Still no luck :-(

What am I missing?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ