[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1202240856370.1917@tux.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:57:37 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: add sysctl to enable slab memory dump
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> > Great! So, why not letting the time tell us if this feature will be obsoleted
> > or not? I'd rather have this patch obsoleted by another one proven better, than
> > just stay still waiting for something that might, or might not, happen in the
> > future.
>
> Because (1) you're adding a sysctl that we don't want to obsolete and
> remove from the kernel that someone will come to depend on and then have
> to find an alternative solution like /dev/mem_notify, and (2) people parse
> messages like this that are emitted to the kernel log that we don't want
> to break in the future.
>
> So NACK on this approach.
Right. We should drop the sysctl and make it into a kernel command line
debugging option instead.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists