[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120224103827.GA2030@x61.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:38:28 -0200
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: add sysctl to enable slab memory dump
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:05:27PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> > I like how slub handles this when it can't allocate more slab with
> > slab_out_of_memory() and has the added benefit of still warning even with
> > __GFP_NORETRY that the oom killer is never called for. If there's really
> > a slab leak happening, there's a good chance that this diagnostic
> > information is going to be emitted by the offending cache at some point in
> > time if you're using slub. This could easily be extended to slab.c, so
> > it's even more reason not to include this type of information in the oom
> > killer.
>
> Works for me. Rafael?
Sure, I'm getting back to the scratchpad right away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists