lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:35:40 +0530
From:	Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Looks OK to me, thanks.  I doubt if those interface changes will cause
> significant disruption.
>

I just found one breakage due to this patch: `cat /proc/self/maps`
does not always get the stack marked right. I think this is because it
gets the $esp a little to early, even before the vma is sent to its
randomized space. That is why /proc/self/smaps works just ok as it
always wins the race due to the sheer volume of data it prints.
Similarly numa_maps always fails since its write volume is lower than
maps. I'll try to fix this.

-- 
Siddhesh Poyarekar
http://siddhesh.in
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists